cdave: (Default)
Very busy at work. No lunch break today.

--

Why do cats sit on papers?

--

Some photo's of the hyperinflation in Zimbabwe. Increasing large bundles of bank notes paying for nothing. An every increasing number of zeros added to new note issued. They knocked 10 zeros off the end earlier this year, and may have to do it again before the year is out.

--

Nurse led drop in centre say: I've likely sprained big trapezoid muscle, which would take around two weeks to start feeling completely better. So take ibuprofen to reduce inflammation. Full range of movement available from both shoulders. Excess movement in left should probably just an elongated tendon, talk to GP next time, but don't worry about it. So I won't.

--

Saw Bond in Basingstoke with: Fuzz, [livejournal.com profile] piesandmash, March and March.

America has exploding petrol. Europe doesn't.

As spotted byFran.

--

Read "Kitty and the Midnight Hour" by Carrie Vaughn (first recommended to me by [livejournal.com profile] makyo over three years ago!) basically in one sitting. Train and tube ride home. A bit before going to sleep. Then a bit more as I was over 3/4 of the way through. Took around 2.5 to 3 hours.

Basic premis: A werewolf running a late call in night show on the supernatural. Werewolves, Vampires, and other unspecified things (and lists only get three items in before being interrupted) are real, but generally try and stay hidden from public view.

Cut for world spoilers. Not really plot spoilers. )

--

More love for the UK online battery shop. They spotted a mistake in some invoices from ages ago, so sent out a polite email with an updated invoice, telling me that I can ignore it, unless I was using it for VAT reasons. I like when shops own up to things without prompting.
cdave: (Default)
Piccy of my cuppa )
What the heck do they use as coffee whitener in the vending machines here? I'm sure it's not normal to be able to dig trenches in it.
They were probably aiming for a light and frothy texture, but have come closer to expanding foam sealant.
cdave: (Default)
I can't get a GP appointment unless it's an emergency (in which case I would go to hospital, surely?) without being registered.

I can't register without filling in some forms, and attending in person. The registration won't be complete until I've had a separate check up. They will let me make an appointment with a GP as soon as I've handed in the forms.

My nearest GP surgery opens almost exactly the latest time I leave the house, and closes at the time I usually get home. They're not open on Saturday. I can't take any time off work to do this this month.

If I slope off work early, I may just have time to grab my passport and a utility bill and register tonight. Then hope they have a late appointment later, and slope off work early again.

If it wasn't for comments I'm not sure I could be bothered.
cdave: (Default)
About three years ago I got a bit paranoid that my left shoulder was moving differently to my right, so went to see the GP. There was an elderly locum in, who just said something along the lines of "bodies aren't symmetric, don't worry." So I didn't.

A couple of weekends ago I had a wardrobe malfunction, and bruised/strained my neck/left shoulder. And it still aches. So I asked iBon to take a movie of my shoulder blades moving.

Watch those blades move )

Yeuarch! Think I'll try and make an appointment with a local GP tomorrow.
cdave: (Default)
First thing I ever crocheted )
It was a birthday present for Vixie

I was going for chirpy, but I think he looks malevontly smug. Like he's just fooled a mollusc into falling for his evil plans!
cdave: (Default)
Overheard at work.

Teleconference Machine: "Please state your name after the tone"
Chairman's Laptop: Crash
Teleconference Machine: "Beep"
Chairman: "Oh F***! Sh**!"
Teleconference Machine: "'Oh F***! Sh**!' has joined the conference."
cdave: (Default)
Yay for Obama!

But seriously, how is that California appears to be passing Proposition 8 titled: "Eliminates Right of Same-Sex Couples to Marry"?

Ergh
cdave: (Angry)
So far it's taken over 10 helpdesk calls to sort out find out what's going with the stupid stupid Verified by Vista phishing look-a-like payment site. (MasterCard SecureCode is the same damn thing).

If a payment site:
appears in an embeded iframe (with no way of seeing the URL),
or in a pop-up with out an address bar,
or comes up after I've already entered my card details and asks for them again,
or triggers a javascript XSS warning on noScript,
or only lists a phone number which is not valid ( 0870 154 0121 );
then I'm not going to trust it!

Here are some valid numbers:

0844 811 9111 Customer service: Takes a while to get through the menus but eventually a human told me there was no failed transaction on my account, but there was a £1 charge due to expire on the 10th. However they can't help with the secure.barclaycard site (and as an aside only have access to 6 months of account data).

0870 156 6485 Barclaycard Secure/3D Secure queries: Only for Debit cards, can't help with Credit card problems.

0844 811 9152 Barclaycard Secure/3D Secure queries: Only for Credit card, can't help with debit card. Only one that seems to be based overseas.

They said that the receipt history page isn't receipts, it's a list of attempted transactions. Clearly. The transaction that was showing up on there was a failed transaction. Even though there's no indication of this. I eventually paid again, and apart from a slightly higher Receipt ID the two "receipts" look identical.

Raah!

If I see a site uses Vilified by Visa, or MasterCard SuckyCode, then I'll will first see if there is another payment option. Then see if there is another site selling the same thing. Then consider if I really need to spend money, before going through all this again.


Then the shop downstairs closed as I walked up to it.
Then vending machine wasn't taking pound coins, so I went and got change.
Then it wasn't taking change.
Then the coffee shop had a massive queue.
So no sugar for Dave.
Grr.

Last night

Oct. 29th, 2008 10:58 am
cdave: (Default)
I found a couple of envelopes blue-tacked to cash machines with A7 flyers for a pyramid scam in it. I took them down as I don't want someone to fall for it, or deal with the physical spam. I think I'm going to turn them into origami cranes.

I also started my first crochet Amigurumi. Using a 2.50 mm hook rather than a 4 mm. It's going to be about 4cm across rather than than 7cm. Oops.

On the plus side I see how it works now. I'm pretty sure I can write down a pattern for what I want to do next before I start on it.
cdave: (Anime)
I know I say I usually just wait until a draft post is out of data and abandon it. I was trying to get that last one posted before the exhibition closed, but failed. At least partially due to spending the last couple of evenings working on a costume for Sunday. Anyone going to the expo?

Speaking of which anyone fancy a grand cosplay ball? I've got my ticket.

Oh, and is anyone planning on going to Novacon and want to share a room?

Craig Gidney, (who ran the Tanith Lee novel discussion at Orbital) is in a spot of financial bother and his publisher is selling pre-orders of his book and giving the whole amount to him, not even covering costs.

One last sfnal thing: I see from issue #6 of Captain Britain & MI:13 the the Cabal have clearly been at work on [livejournal.com profile] paulcornell2 is it features a villain called [livejournal.com profile] drplokta.
cdave: (Default)
I saw this quite distinctive photo of a fallen angel caught in telephone cables in the paper last week over a week ago. Given that it's in central London, and open to 7pm for one week only I thought I'd pop down after work.

Some thoughts on the exhibition )

And then I went to the Tate Modern for lunch today a couple of a few days ago to see the new turbine hall exhibition.

Some thoughts on the exhibition )

RSVP

Oct. 23rd, 2008 10:27 am
cdave: (Default)
[Poll #1283762]
cdave: (Default)
Sweet martini: 3/4 pars gin, 1/8 part dry vermouth, 1/8 part sweet vermouth.

Medium martini: 4/5 part gin. 1/5 part vermouth

Dry martini: 5/6 parts gin 1/6 part vermouth

Glass martini: Swirl vermouth and ice in a glass. Discard. Add gin.

Breath martini: Drink a shot of vermouth. Breath into a glass. Add gin.

Los Alamos martini: Place a bottle of vermouth on top of an atomic bomb test. Place a glass of gin downwind.

Churchill martini: Pour a glass of gin, while glancing angrily across the room at a sealed bottle of vermouth.

Ideal martini: A glass of gin drunk whilst looking at a picture of vermouth.

Inspired by comments on demiurgent's post.

{edit}

Ooh! IDEA! Homoeopathic Vermouth.

We could do double blind experiments to discover what the difference between no vermouth, and probably no vermouth is.

Of course we'd need a large sample base :)
cdave: (Default)
.

Allowing time for shipping from America (often "don't even ask where it is until 6 weeks time"), it's about time for me to start looking at webcomic stores to see if there's anything I need to order for Christmas delivery.
cdave: (Default)
10102008710

Oops knitted another. Really need to start work on prezzies instead.
cdave: (Default)
The book I've least enjoyed, was a Christian propaganda, thinly veiled as a sci-fi novel. Just as the protagonist gives up looking for proof, and accepts that God had saved his life, the proof that it was a miracle all along pops up. The resolution just rings false with me.

I'm aware that many of the great historical works of art were produced explicitly for Christianity, but I tend to avoid anything from the last century that markets itself as such.

However of my favourite illustrators is taking part in an upcoming Christian comic book anthology. So it looks like I'll be buying something created explicitly as Christian. I'll be interested to see if it's not preachy. Or if it is, if the story and art is good enough to over come this.

I'm trying to figure out what this starslip extra comic says about Vanderbeam.

The Starslip universe has not (to my recollection) dealt with religion before.
In fact not many that I read do. Skin Horse lists blood types for its characters, but not religion.

I don't think the strips primary purpose was actually statement on Vanderbeam's religion. Nor his intelligence for that matter. It's not clear, but I don't think he's saying these are statements of fact. It's more of a comment on how he values Beauty above Truth. A view he's shown before. The only reason that the religious context is interesting is how conspicuous it is in its absence elsewhere.

Analysing an evolutionary model of religious memes.

Make your own Papercraft Ceiling Cat (if that's the bible translation you follow).
Seen at Snowking's
cdave: (Default)
I'll admit it. I don't like do the patterned bits on the hat I started ages ago.

They're fiddely, and slow it right down. I've got to the point where there's only a couple of rows left to do at the bottom of the hat part.So I need to start thinking about ribbing, and possibly switching to 6 needles, or using stitch markers to deliniate were the scarfs start. Bleh. I'm officially abandoning it for now.

However, I wanted to get started on some ideas I've had for Christmas prezzies, so I've started going to the Islington stitch 'n' bitch group again.

Since I can't show prezzies, here's some small hats )

It's quite tempting to learn to crotchet little things next.
cdave: (Default)
American's were offered mortgages the could only afford so long as interest rates stayed low. If they had risen, but house prices kept rising it wouldn't be a problem either as the houses could be sold to service the debt.
It was SO easy. Fill out a few online forms, make some choices, and there I was, about to close that loan. But then I did an odd thing. I carefully read the papers I was about to sign (I'm one of THOSE people). And in that residential loan application, right on line something or other, was a number that didn't make any sense to me at all. It was labeled "total household income" and was almost twice the pitiful amount I actually earn.

From where did that number come? It certainly never came from me. Since my signature would be at the bottom of this application I wanted to make sure everything was correct, so I called the mortgage broker. For the first time we spoke. She was a very nice lady, too, and explained that number was the variable required for all the ratios to be correct so I could qualify for the loan.

"But it isn't true," I said.

"Do you want the loan or not?" she asked.

Not.

Banks repackage the mortgage debts and sell them on.

Intrest rates rise. House prices fall. The repackaged mortgages are suddenly a liability, rather than an asset. The banks aren't sure who owns these bad debts, so won't lend money to each other in case it turns out that they don't have the assets to secure the loan against.

Short selling attempts to adjust the value of a bank down, but goes to far.

Here's my question. Why does no-one know who bought those repackaged mortgage debts?

The whole point of this scheme is that the mortgage lenders have been paying interest to the investment banks that own these repackaged debts. So how can banks say they don't know where the debt is?
cdave: (Default)
Tetris LARP:
The act of shuffling boxes around to make space while unpacking.

[Poll #1269641]

No cheating and looking up the answers (Even though there is a really spiffing Venn diagram).

[Poll #1269642]

Profile

cdave: (Default)
cdave

June 2018

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728 2930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 16th, 2026 12:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios